Most-Read Feedback Articles (Last 365 Days)
- 2017-05-01 - A Paradigm Active/40 Owner on Active Speakers
- 2017-07-01 - The Luxman's League
- 2017-04-15 - Here's What Happened to the Devialet Gold Phantom
- 2017-04-17 - MQA: Smoke and Mirrors?
- 2017-04-29 - Ayre's Laid-Back Sound
- 2017-04-23 - MQA: The Emperor's New Clothes?
- 2017-04-16 - KEF Praise, Devialet Question
- 2017-03-10 - New Amp for Focal Sopra No2s -- Or Maybe Not
- 2017-07-30 - PrimaLuna, Devialet, Hegel Music Systems, NAD -- Integrated Amp Shootout
- 2017-06-09 - He Says Ken Is Correct!
- Category: Reader Feedback Reader Feedback
- Created: 14 March 2011 14 March 2011
To Doug Schneider,
Thanks so much for a real review! Price is so often mistaken as an indicator of sound quality! A good example is the time I switched a Walkman CD player into a friend’s system while he was in the bathroom in place of about $3000 worth of DAC-upsample-black-magic stuff. We listened the rest of the night and after three hours he still couldn't tell the difference! Boy, was he pissed when I revealed the switch. Good to see someone tell the truth.
Not all high-priced equipment is a rip-off but, certainly, some of it is. You’re also right that higher prices are often associated with better sound quality when, in fact, many times the opposite is true. I've written articles about this in the past and will likely write more in the future.
For me, what’s unsettling is that too many reviewers aren’t calling foul on these high-priced, ill-performing products. Instead, many are turning a blind eye to them or, in some cases, actually endorsing overpriced junk. Over time, though, I think this will backfire on them because the only way credibility can be established and maintained is to not be afraid to speak your mind and to say what’s true. . . . Doug Schneider