Most-Read Feedback Articles (Last 365 Days)
- 2017-05-01 - A Paradigm Active/40 Owner on Active Speakers
- 2017-07-01 - The Luxman's League
- 2017-01-24 - Sonus Faber Olympica III vs. PSB Imagine T3
- 2017-04-15 - Here's What Happened to the Devialet Gold Phantom
- 2017-04-17 - MQA: Smoke and Mirrors?
- 2017-04-29 - Ayre's Laid-Back Sound
- 2017-04-23 - MQA: The Emperor's New Clothes?
- 2017-04-16 - KEF Praise, Devialet Question
- 2017-02-18 - Amp Choices for KEF Reference 1s
- 2017-03-10 - New Amp for Focal Sopra No2s -- Or Maybe Not
- Category: Reader Feedback Reader Feedback
- Created: 29 July 2013 29 July 2013
To Doug Schneider,
I am writing as a follow-up to an earlier published post titled "DACs: dCS, Esoteric, or . . . ?" In this post I was curious about a possible DAC upgrade and was asking which brand you might recommend. You were particularly positive about the EMM Labs DAC2X and the Meitner MA-1 DACs. I recently had an opportunity to hear the DAC2X as well as the dCS Debussy at a dealer that demonstrated both on a system on par with mine. I wanted you to know that the DAC2X is a very musical product and one that really made the music sound fantastic. I would rank it on a higher plane than the Debussy. In the end, however, I did choose to go with the Esoteric D-02. While the D-02 is significantly more expensive, it is a world-class DAC and probably fits really well with my Esoteric A-02 amp and C-03 preamp and was the main reason I chose it. It should also be the last DAC I will need for a long time. However, for any of the readers considering a DAC, I would agree with your assessment that the DAC2x is one that should be put on a short list. It really is a very outstanding product.
Thanks for all of your suggestions.
Thanks for the update! I think what’s most important is that you got to hear the DAC2X before you bought the D-02, so you made your purchase with all the facts. I also realize that when you add a new component in, there are things to look at outside of just sound -- the fit with your A-02 and C-03 makes sense. . . . Doug Schneider