Most-Read Feedback Articles (Last 365 Days)
- 2017-07-01 - The Luxman's League
- 2018-01-04 - Legacy Signature SE Up Against the Magico A3
- 2017-07-30 - PrimaLuna, Devialet, Hegel Music Systems, NAD -- Integrated Amp Shootout
- 2018-01-01 - Naim and Magico
- 2017-06-09 - He Says Ken Is Correct!
- 2017-08-28 - Revel Performa3 F206 vs. KEF R500
- 2017-05-30 - Meitner Upgrade Worth It?
- 2017-08-10 - To Change for the Better
- 2017-09-01 - Buying the Best -- "Hard Knocks" Learning
- 2017-10-02 - "The MQA Balloon"
- Category: Reader Feedback Reader Feedback
- Created: 23 December 2012 23 December 2012
To S. Andrea Sundaram,
I have a Wadia 861 for CD playback and use my Oppo BDP-105 for high-resolution formats like 24/96, 24/192, and DSD. Do you still think DSD (via SACD) is still the best format?
The most natural sounding recordings I've heard are done in pure DSD. There are a number of factors that go into that comparison: choice of microphones, microphone placement, other electronics in the signal chain, recording venue, skill and intention of the recording engineers, etc. Based on my experience with a wide variety of albums through a range of equipment, I tend to think that the DSD format holds some advantage over 96kHz -- and even 192kHz -- PCM, but I find many great recordings done both ways. . . . S. Andrea Sundaram