Most-Read Feedback Articles (Last 365 Days)
- 2018-01-04 - Legacy Signature SE Up Against the Magico A3
- 2018-01-01 - Naim and Magico
- 2017-08-28 - Revel Performa3 F206 vs. KEF R500
- 2017-09-01 - Buying the Best -- "Hard Knocks" Learning
- 2017-10-02 - "The MQA Balloon"
- 2017-10-01 - What If MQA Succeeds?
- 2017-10-07 - Some Impressive MQA Testing
- 2017-12-21 - The Validity of Doug's Sonus Faber Olympica III Review
- 2018-03-04 - The High-Priced Deception?
- 2017-11-24 - The Whereabouts of the Yamaha NS-5000 Loudspeaker
- Category: Reader Feedback Reader Feedback
- Created: 29 October 2013 29 October 2013
To Doug Schneider,
I just read your article comparing the sound of these two Sonus Faber speakers. I want a set of new Sonus Faber speakers but I cannot afford the Olympica III. However, I can easily handle the Venere 3.0 and would probably get it with the wood trim. Just how much would I be losing with the Venere 3.0 vs. the Olympica III?
The price difference between the Olympica III ($13,500/pair) and the Venere 3.0 ($3498-$3998/pair, depending on finish) is huge, so I’m not surprised that you can afford one quite easily but not the other. That said, the Olympica III, despite being the better-built and superior-sounding speaker, isn’t three or four times as good in those respects as the Venere 3.0 is, which is what the price difference implies; rather, as the article I wrote says, it’s about 25-30% in the various areas. As I also mentioned, sonically they’re cut from the same cloth, so you’re getting something similar sounding with the 3.0 for a fraction of the III's price.
So if Sonus Faber is what you want and the 3.0 is what you can afford, go for it -- my suspicion is that you’re going to be very happy with what you get. . . . Doug Schneider