Most-Read Feedback Articles (Last 365 Days)
- 2018-01-04 - Legacy Signature SE Up Against the Magico A3
- 2017-07-30 - PrimaLuna, Devialet, Hegel Music Systems, NAD -- Integrated Amp Shootout
- 2018-01-01 - Naim and Magico
- 2017-08-28 - Revel Performa3 F206 vs. KEF R500
- 2017-08-10 - To Change for the Better
- 2017-09-01 - Buying the Best -- "Hard Knocks" Learning
- 2017-10-02 - "The MQA Balloon"
- 2017-10-01 - What If MQA Succeeds?
- 2017-10-07 - Some Impressive MQA Testing
- 2017-12-21 - The Validity of Doug's Sonus Faber Olympica III Review
- Category: Reader Feedback Reader Feedback
- Created: 15 November 2014 15 November 2014
To Doug Schneider,
Two quick questions concerning your [Bowers & Wilkins 684 S2] review:
1) You mentioned a chestiness in the lower midrange. Do you think this could this be addressed with equalization adjustments?
2) For entry-level audiophile tower speakers, would the 684 S2 be a good choice or the CM8 S2? Would the extra cost of the CM8 S2 be worth it?
I believe that the chestiness I heard from the 684 S2 speaker is something inherent in the design. As a result, equalization could be used to diminish it by removing some objectionable frequencies (likely around the 200Hz range), but it’s not going to fix it completely.
I have not heard the CM8 S2 speaker, so I can’t tell you if it’s worth it or not. Still, I suggest you definitely seek it out because when I reviewed the 684 S2, I wasn’t entirely impressed with it, which is why I said this at the end of the review: “I recommend that prospective buyers first listen to this new model with familiar music, to determine if it’s the right speaker for them.” There’s a good chance, therefore, that you might find the CM8 S2 worth the extra cost if its overall performance is better, particularly if it lacks the chestiness the 684 S2 exhibited. . . . Doug Schneider